Of all the dire issues faced by our nation, stopping all third graders from accessing abortion is obviously the priority.
Poland’s ultra-strict abortion laws might get even worse — but not if its women have anything to say about it.
Both candidates have views on the issue that deviate slightly from their respective parties.
Obstacles placed around having abortions don’t actually mitigate them: they just make things exponentially more dangerous for women.
The categories of the three presidential debates are woefully broad, but they give plenty of leeway to tackle controversial issues the candidates differ critically on. …
Pretending it’s no longer an issue isn’t going to help the countless poor and marginalized women still unable to access it.
Roe v. Wade doesn’t matter that much to women who can’t afford it.
Obviously, even saints can be pretty problematic.
For further evidence, just look at rates of teen pregnancy in states mandating abstinence-only education.
As anyone who still watches TV news would know.
Another day, another example of abortion restrictions to “make women safer” doing anything but.
Patel was paradoxically convicted for feticide and neglect of a child.