Tag Archives: babies

If You Want A Baby, Stop Buying Marc Jacobs

Did you have a baby last year? We didn’t — good thing, too, because babies are expensive and we really can’t afford one at the moment. Yesterday, the USDA released its estimate for what it will cost to raise a child born in 2007 until he or she turns 18. Factoring for inflation, middle-income families will spend $269,040, and this doesn’t include college, SAT prep classes, Brett Favre jerseys, iPhones, or whatever happens to be popular by the time these children hit middle school. For about the same amount of money, you could buy this house in Clermont, FL, but why you would is beyond me. [Reuters] Keep reading »

If Hillary and Barack Had A Baby

[The New Republic]
Keep reading »

Frisky Quote Of The Day: Kelly Osbourne

“I respect Gwyneth Paltrow, because she covers her babies’ faces – she never lets the paparazzi get that picture. I’m not going to put the Spice Girls down, because I’m a fan, but they took their kids on stage at every single show of that last tour. To be a child of three and have 25,000 girls screaming at you – I don’t think that’s necessarily good. But I’m not a mum, what do I know?” — Kelly Osbourne [The Sunday Times, U.K.]

Keep reading »

Ford’s New Model

Fashion designer Tom Ford knows this season’s hottest accessory is the baby bump and he wants to make one for his 2008 Collection. The dapper American legend raised Gucci, YSL, and his own house, but now he wants a kid….and what a stylish looker his baby will be! Although Ford’s been with his partner, Richard Buckley, former Editor-in-Chief of Vogue Hommes International, foreva-eva, Ford admits he slept with women until he finally realized he was too hot to not be a homo. So now, for the first time in about thirty years, one lucky lady will get to be his sperm receptacle/baby mama! And the fringe benefits sound even better. After all, one womb for a free wardrobe is better than the going surrogacy rate for sure. [Style Dash] Keep reading »

We’re 50 Percent Sure That It’s A Boy!

More than 100 women have filed a lawsuit against Acu-Gen, a company that offers at-home blood tests to determine a baby’s sex, because their test results were wrong. “I wouldn’t have had an abortion, but there are women out there who experience really big disappointment,” said one mother whose test results were incorrect. “They really want to give their husbands the little boy they want, or a little girl, and they will abort based on these results.” Honestly, we think that it’s a good thing these DNA tests aren’t 100 percent accurate if couples are considering having abortions based on the results. [Chicago Tribune] Keep reading »