Quick Pic: Ugly-Cute Or Just Ugly-Ugly?

WMassSoprano
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 12:48 pm: [report]

Oh wow!  Just Ugly-Ugly.  Anyone who has that amount of money to throw away on something like that should be forced to donate it to a worthy cause… or to me.

emflow
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 12:57 pm: [report]

Kinda ugly-cute, but I’ve seen ugly-cute done better in the $5-$10 price range.

Revolutionary Girl
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 01:10 pm: [report]

You mean there are 100s of idiots walking around with that? Terrible.

eclipse
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 01:15 pm: [report]

I call this a waste of money and hideous to boot.

stargirlmia89
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 02:59 pm: [report]

Ugly ugly, no question. Who the hell would spend so much on that thing?

rsonnack
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 03:13 pm: [report]

three letters: wtf.

averardoll
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 03:44 pm: [report]

Wait.. so in the 5th grade, I totally bought a dachshund-shaped bag from Claire’s. I brought it to school and totally got made fun of by the mean girls. BUT this is oK? Is it a backpack? I thought miniback packs went out with Clueless.

remembercedricdiggory
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 11:50 pm: [report]

@averardoll; The stuffed animal backpacks are popular at my high school right now. And it’s the popular chicks with them. I don’t get it either…

CaleeKay
wrote on October 16 2009 @ 12:55 am: [report]

i had a snow-tiger backpack when i was younger, like the furry ones for 7 year olds tho.

and is fugly an option for this?

becktasm
wrote on October 16 2009 @ 02:51 am: [report]

Not quite worth the price tag, but I bet it’d be a lot of fun to have when your friends are drunk. I know drunk me would find that thing completely horrifying. Hell, sober me is struggling to deal. However, one of my friends would probably try to kill it, and then I’d be out $925.

relright
wrote on October 17 2009 @ 05:44 pm: [report]

Collector’s item?
Hopefully?

CTeezy
wrote on October 17 2009 @ 06:13 pm: [report]

It almost seems to me that designers are playing a joke on the women who buy this stuff… like how far into the realm of the ridiculous they can take certain items before people stop buying them and realize that $1700 for a pair of shoes that are ugly AND you can’t walk in them is too much money to pay… and people wonder why the economy is in shambles.

Fever
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 12:25 am: [report]

Omg it’s brown mink! Not to go all PETA but that’s just gross, I would not buy it just for that. And it’s worth almost 1k!? WTF, you know what I could buy with 1k?????????? LOL

Booksmarts
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 07:18 am: [report]

Dreadfully ugly-ugly. I’ll never use it, but I’ll get it anyway and display it as art in my house.

On second thought, that thing is just too effin’ hideous.

BlueVibe
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 06:56 pm: [report]

BUTT ugly.  And nightmare-inducing.

mikeyellenlee
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 07:23 pm: [report]

I love it and would totally sport it but why the f**k is it 925 bucks?

NaomiK
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 07:25 pm: [report]

What. The. Hell. Does it come alive in the middle of the night to eat your face off, too?

NaomiK
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 07:27 pm: [report]

Oh, gross. I just clicked the link. It’s real fur.

melissaann
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 07:33 pm: [report]

@Naomik, thanks for pointing that out. Why kill a cute creature to make an ugly one?

Kari Fuller
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 07:45 pm: [report]

Ugly, ugly, ugly….I have better things to spend my money on and would not buy real fur even if it was cute!

Kati-Anne
wrote on October 18 2009 @ 08:06 pm: [report]

I would definitely buy this if it cost $20. I have this problem where I buy really ugly pieces of crap just so I can prove to people that it exists and that I have it. They’re like trophies. Hideous, hideous trophies.

Booksmarts
wrote on October 19 2009 @ 08:58 am: [report]

@NaomiK, goodness, that’s terrible! Real fur? Wtf?????

NaomiK
wrote on October 19 2009 @ 06:27 pm: [report]

I don’t get why people still use real fur when there’s good faux fur available… Bad for the eyes, bad for little innocent animals, bad for the environment. I remember thinking fur coats were gross in first grade.

Cha_Bella
wrote on October 23 2009 @ 12:55 am: [report]

I don’t see a toad at all!

I looks like a cross between the Abominable Snowman and a sugar baby!

Cha_Bella
wrote on October 23 2009 @ 12:56 am: [report]

it*