Frisky RSS Frisky on Google
news swag bag news what's viral
news

Today’s Lady News: Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Speaks Out Against The Stupak Amendment

Comments (7)
Bookmark and Share Email

  • In this video clip, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) speaks out against the health care reform bill’s Stupak-Pitts Amendment, which limits how private insurance companies can offer coverage for abortion. More conservatively inclined Democrats voted for the House of Representative’s version of the health care bill this past Saturday night only after the Stupak-Pitts Amendment was included. The video is a little snoozy at first, but 45 seconds in, Sen. Gillibrand gets to the good stuff about why Stupak-Pitts isn’t good for our reproductive rights. [YouTube]
  • Speaking of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) has said today that the Senate has the 60 votes needed to block the controversial bill when it makes its way to there. Let’s hope so. [Huffington Post]
  • Bad news: New York’s State Senate has delayed a vote to legalize same-sex marriage and it is unclear when they’ll take it up again. [New York Times]
  • Good news: a D.C. Council committee voted today to send a same-sex marriage bill to the full city council for a vote, where it is expected to pass. [Washington Post]
  • Cleveland City Council in Ohio will vote tonight on whether to include transgender people in the city’s anti-discrimination law. [Advocate]
  • Anti-abortion extremist Scott Roeder confessed in a phone call with the Associated Press that he murdered Dr. George Tiller, a Wichita, Kansas physician who provided late-term abortions. “Because of the fact preborn children’s lives were in imminent danger this was the action I chose…I want to make sure that the focus is, of course, obviously on the preborn children and the necessity to defend them,” Roeder said. [AP]
  • The American Medical Association, the nation’s largest doctors’ group, has called for the repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy which advises gay and lesbian servicemen to keep their homosexuality a secret. [Fox News]
  • Michelle Obama‘s poll numbers have dropped from 72 percent favorability last March to 61 percent favorability in a recent Gallup Poll. [Politico]—What have you got against vegetable gardens, people?
  • Arthur Leroy Shoot, a pedophile whom prosecutors called “a sexual psychopath,” received 17 and a half years in prison for attempting to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor overseas. You’d think having been convicted of sexual offenses against children three times, not to mention being called a “sexual psychopath,” would be enough to put someone away for life. [L.A. Times]
  • Sandra Guzman, a former editor at the New York Post, who was fired last month, filed a lawsuit in federal accusing the editor, Col Allen, of sexism and racism. [Gawker]
  • Lionel McIntyre, a male associate professor at Columbia University, allegedly punched a female colleague in the face at an off-campus bar over the weekend. McIntyre was later arrested for assault and harassment. [Columbia Spectator]
  • Pop culture critic Emily Nussbaum analyzed how TV is having “a cougar moment” right now. [New York magazine]

INTERNATIONAL

  • After a ten-year legal battle, a lesbian in France has won the right to adopt a child. [BBC]
  • The L.A. Times says wives, mothers and daughters of men involved in Mexico’s narcotics trade are more frequently being used as drug traffickers because they supposedly pass thorough police checkpoints more easily. [L.A. Times]

Tags: feminism, todays lady news, abortion, reproductive rights, stupak amendment, health care reform, health care

Comments (7)
Bookmark and Share Email
comments
equnsuocha's avatar

equnsuocha
wrote on November 10 2009 @ 06:12 pm: [report]

So anyone who reads Frisky lately knows my feeling on abortion, mandatory notification and the like, however, it is in fact an elective surgery and I dont know any insurance company that currently pays for it so I cant see how this ammendment is anything other than fodder for the political machine to keep us focused on the ridiculous and not on what matters and that is healthcare for all


secretstevie's avatar

secretstevie
wrote on November 10 2009 @ 08:22 pm: [report]

@equnsuocha, it matters because the point of government healthcare is to provide options where there were none.  we don’t want things to stay the same as insurance already has it.  reproductive care is a right for all.


equnsuocha's avatar

equnsuocha
wrote on November 11 2009 @ 02:20 pm: [report]

@secret this ammendment isnt banning abortion it just inst funding it which is what the situation is today.  I dont think people should be forced to pay for others abortions.  I think if it is medically neccesary then it should most certainly be covered and in most cases it is.  But as women we can not stand up and scream about our right to CHOOSE and then demand someone pay for that choice.  It seems hypocritical and wrong.


PinkRanger's avatar

PinkRanger
wrote on November 11 2009 @ 02:58 pm: [report]

@equnsuocha: I see where you are coming from, but an abortion is not more expensive than a full-term pregnancy, so if an insurance company were to cover it, they may actually be saving their company money. In that same respect, it would save tax payers money if it were part of a public option.

The real zinger about this amendment is that it is putting limits on reproductive rights. Period. Laws like this one, and the parental notification one, are policies that are orchestrated by the right to snowball and eventually outlaw abortion. I have faith that the American people will never let that happen, but sometimes my faith falters.


bumbler's avatar

bumbler
wrote on November 11 2009 @ 03:05 pm: [report]

Presently, more than 85 percent of private-insurance plans cover abortion services.

From http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/news/press-releases/2009/pr11072009_househcrbillstupak.html

I know it’s a biased source but apparently only pro-choice and anti-choice websites cover this information.


SuzannR's avatar

SuzannR
wrote on November 11 2009 @ 03:11 pm: [report]

Maybe I’m way off here - but I thought this Amendment banned the use of gov’t funding for all abortions, whether a result of incest, rape, or threatening the life of the mother.


Ariandre's avatar

Ariandre
wrote on November 20 2009 @ 05:45 pm: [report]

@ SuzannR:  That is what I got out of it too.


Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment on The Frisky.

Username:
Password:
 

Auto-login on future visits
Show my name in the online users list

 

  register | forgotten password


frisky poll

frisky tv Frisky TV
frisky friends