To Cut Or Not To Cut? That Is The Question.
Sex writer Rachel Kramer Bussel is in a heated debate over at Jewcy about the subject of circumcised penises. She votes “nay” on foreskins, while writer Esther Goldberg likes her men au natural. Both have good points, but where do you stand? [Jewcy.com]




















TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
atlgirl
wrote on April 2 2008 @ 12:41 pm: [report]
I’ve never even seen the uncut version (at least in living color), and I don’t want to.
Kiki T
wrote on April 2 2008 @ 01:05 pm: [report]
I’ve seen and done both…philosophically, uncut is the way to go. it’s an unnecessary surgery, and seeing pics of it being done—OMG, tooo much. The babies always look traumatized. However, when being totally selfish, I do prefer the uncut ones as far as aesthetics…but you know, once it’s hard, it doesn’t matter what they are…they all look alike and work the same. As long as it can get hard—that is my bigger priority.
JessicaWakefield
wrote on April 2 2008 @ 02:20 pm: [report]
Cut is definitely better looking in the huh, flesh, but once it’s on the inside, seriously it don’t matter. (Not totally keen to blow it though.) But if I had a baby boy, I’d just leave it alone. He can deal with issues later and chop it off if he wants, but the choice will at least be his.
Simcha
wrote on April 2 2008 @ 02:28 pm: [report]
Um, maybe I’m partial because I’m a tribe member, but I’ve had both traif and kosher dick and a nipped tip is cleaner, aka more suckable. So, you know, it’s not a deal breaker but it’s a preference…
shortie
wrote on April 2 2008 @ 02:38 pm: [report]
@JessicaWakefield: you’re going to have him decide when he’s old enough to remember the pain? i think i’d stay uncut, even though you guys seem to prefer cut. personally, i don’t mind either way.
teets
wrote on April 2 2008 @ 05:48 pm: [report]
Aside from the religious/cultural associations, it kinda seems like an archaic form of plastic surgery. I’m with JW - let the boy decide.
Elle
wrote on April 2 2008 @ 08:26 pm: [report]
I vote for cut. It seems cleaner and definitely more aesthetically pleasing.
Croutons
wrote on April 3 2008 @ 05:23 am: [report]
Circumcision Halves Risk Of HIV Infection. ‘Nuff said!
Slainna
wrote on April 15 2008 @ 08:50 pm: [report]
Sure, there are some health benefits (however negligible) to be had from circumcision, but men evolved with foreskins for a reason, so leave it on! The cleanliness and HIV protection are easily negated but washing up and not having unprotected sex, something every person should be doing anyways. I wouldn’t want to suck a dirty man, uncut OR cut, period.