Starbucks Unveils Its New Topless Logo
What do you think of Starbucks new logo? Some people are not pleased with the mermaid lady’s newly-exposed nipples and have started calling the chain “Slutbucks”. All we care about is whether the slutty new mermaid doesn’t burn her coffee like the old one did. [StarTribune.com]


















TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
Kiki T
wrote on May 15 2008 @ 09:41 am: [report]
Boobs or no boobs, the logo is ugly!!! it makes me think of seaweed and squid.
Why did they even change it? When rich companies have too much time on their hands, I suppose…
LovesIt
wrote on May 15 2008 @ 09:43 am: [report]
Seems like a bad investment on their part… especially considering Americans are cutting back on unnecessary expenditures (overpriced, designer coffee) in light of the economy’s current condition.
Emily
wrote on May 15 2008 @ 10:05 am: [report]
its actually their original logo.
Catherine
wrote on May 15 2008 @ 10:05 am: [report]
I kind of like that the logo is unattractive. It has more character, less polish (which, I realize, is exactly what they want me to think! I’m a slave to marketing.)
rachelkramerbussel
wrote on May 15 2008 @ 10:32 am: [report]
I don’t like it. Not cause of the boobs (and I think “Slutbucks” is hilarious) but just the design. I also tend to like whatever I’m used to, but for whatever reason, I prefer the former logo.
In other Starbucks news, has anyone noticed that they now have calorie counts on all their baked goods? It’s kinda freaky though I think it’s a good thing for our health (also a good way to not et you to order any!).
cbass8
wrote on May 15 2008 @ 12:02 pm: [report]
I’m with you Rachel. I hate it, becuase it’s awful. The boobs are a secondary issue.
Elle
wrote on May 17 2008 @ 01:42 pm: [report]
I never understood their logo. I don’t care if the lady has nipples or no nipples. People who pay attention to that clearly have too much time on their hands.