Seven (Inches) Or Better
There’s a new online dating site for those women who think size definitely matters. 7OrBetter.com only accepts men who are packing at least seven inches of artillery. The site was conceived under the premise that women want to know what their date is working with before investing too much wasted time. But they can’t exactly ask for that info on the first or second date—so now they can know upfront. But don’t expect any sleazy talk or nudity—because the members are supposed to be “quality” people looking for a “quality” relationship. So, I’m guessing it’s like an eHarmony for above-average men? The one plus is that the site is free. The biggest negative? There are probably about 10 guys for every 1,000 women. There’s no explanation as to how the site guarantees the men’s size, but let’s hope girth is measured, as well as length, because pencils are about as much fun as a stubby crayon.

















TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 07:39 am: [report]
W….T….F
retro chic
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 08:07 am: [report]
There are hooter and coochie sites everywhere, and I doubt we’d see a site for “Joe The Six-Pack” or “Avis.” So, why not 7+? I think it’s great. Everyone is happy. But, it’s easy to spot these guys anyway. 7+ men have what I call BDS (Big Dick Syndrome) and “pack it” in their personalities, too. And, nts, they don’t drive Porches.
I’m with Samantha (SATC) on this one. It accidentally spawned writing a paper for me in pre-Internet college “in the name of science.” Survey methods and results for another post. Suffice it to say, we were swamped for the list—after we skimmed it first, that is.
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 08:15 am: [report]
@retro chic: My want of a Porsche has nothing to do with the size of my penis.
retro chic
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 08:24 am: [report]
Chee…se, And it’s a good thing! Bully! It’s a common non-joke joke.
littleloulou
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 08:32 am: [report]
No big deal, men objectify women everyday for the way they look. Why is it such a shock when women do the same.
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 08:42 am: [report]
@littleloulou: It’s a little different when it’s in your pants, and this website was either created and/or paid for by men. Oh, and when you choose a handle and talk about objectifying women I shall just say “DAMN! You are little!”
retro chic
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 08:59 am: [report]
Haha, Chee…se, someone woke up on the wrong side of the cracker. Everyone’s entitled to pursue their preferences. ‘Course it’s produced by men—the curious female is warned by the lop-sided gender ratio, but may want to aim for larger fish in a smaller barrel anyway.
ps: Last time I looked, I keep my boobs in my clothes, too.
tabby
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 09:01 am: [report]
The thing is that some of my best girlfriends are size queens and this would be perfect for them. My best friend has dumped men (partially) due to their small size and stayed with a few losers for longer than necessary because they “were packin’”. If a website like this can save a few people some wasted time and can save a smaller guy’s ego by not having to date my friend, then more power to ‘em.
That said, I forwarded this to my boyfriend and he was completely mortified and insisted that it must be a joke.
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 09:04 am: [report]
@retro chic: You may keep them under wraps, but volume wise, you are going to beat every man if you’re even remotely endowed. My point being, you would need some seriously baggy clothing to cover them up, and I really don’t see it that often with self respecting women.
Tetrine
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 09:52 am: [report]
The way I see it, if this is website your type of thing as a woman, why the hell not! I can’t go a day without overhearing some guy talk how how big or not some girl’s breasts or ass is… it’s all right out there in the open for men to see and judge, so why not give women some way to do the same.
Arty
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 09:56 am: [report]
Can we have a dating site where everyone has to get a high enough score on an IQ test to get in?
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 09:57 am: [report]
Here is the thing, I guy with a big schlong, isn’t going to go down on you, because he thinks he can satisfy you with it alone. If he think he can, more power to him, but in all likely-hood it’s gonna suck for you.
PinkRanger
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 10:02 am: [report]
eh….it bothers me that there are dating sites only for girls with big boobs and things like that…I don’t see this as “revenge” exactly, I see it as more of the same bs. If this is what you look for in a guy…..chances are you might dissmiss some good cathes, and end up with exactly what you wanted. a big d ick. lol.
fallenangel915
wrote on April 17 2009 @ 02:22 pm: [report]
Size don’t mean sh*t if you don’t know how to use it!
dream316
wrote on April 18 2009 @ 02:31 am: [report]
Fallenangel you are SO right. However, CheeeeEEEEse, there are men with big ones who can satisfy in more than one way physically, and those are the ones girls stay with longer than their otherwise loserish behavior merits.
aries3_04
wrote on April 18 2009 @ 07:54 am: [report]
SMH. If this is what people want to do, then okay. I have to wonder how shallow people are that the dealbreaker for dating/relationships is dependent upon breast/penis size. Maybe I’ve just been lucky with the men I’ve dated though because I don’t think about it.
slip
wrote on April 18 2009 @ 08:20 am: [report]
Cheese: with great power comes great responsibility. A well-hung man has very little margin for error. If he causes discomfort or actual damage, he’s not gonna get invited back. So he has to be very patient and pay a lot of attention to how his partner is progressing. He often has to do more things for her in foreplay and work harder to be better at them than other guys. He may even make it a practice to bring her to orgasm once or twice with his hands or his tongue before he asks her to meet his needs.
The last thing he wants is for word to get out that he only has size going for him.
danijerzygirl
wrote on April 18 2009 @ 08:24 am: [report]
Size can make up for a lot of other innabilities that can be coached and taught to a man. If he doesn’t fill your needs, nothing is going to help long term.
theoldman
wrote on April 18 2009 @ 08:47 am: [report]
@Arty There are a couple I can think of rightstuffdating.com pretty elitist in some respects but definitely intelligent. Mensa requires you to be in the top 2% in “intelligence” to join. Does that make them any better? There are very nice people who have good manners and people who are jerks.
For the rest, like beauty, size is superficial and fades with age.
Isabela Laval
wrote on April 19 2009 @ 02:35 pm: [report]
I wonder if they have pictures of penises alongside rulers, just to confirm….
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 19 2009 @ 02:49 pm: [report]
@Isabela Laval: They go door to door to confirm…
retro chic
wrote on April 19 2009 @ 07:39 pm: [report]
@slip, TruthKing, Tabby: agreed; you got the picture.
Does it seem a tad shallow to presume size pref is only about ogling or elitist sexual pursuits? For some, there are needs vs wants. And, jerks will be jerks no matter what; the unskilled won’t be asked back, as slip said.
MsTorrence
wrote on April 20 2009 @ 01:22 pm: [report]
@Chee…se: I don’t know what planet you are on, but Big Men usally go down on you first because they don’t want you to be scared. If you don’t know anything about that, apparently you aren’t as big as you thought you were…
I’m black, I know about big dicks!!
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 20 2009 @ 01:26 pm: [report]
@MsTorrence: You are apparently quite familiar with that stereotype, how can you not be wrong about what else you imply?
MsTorrence
wrote on April 20 2009 @ 01:29 pm: [report]
@Chee…se: Pick up a book Einstien. That is not a stereotype it is a scientific fact!!
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 20 2009 @ 01:34 pm: [report]
@MsTorrence: Wow, debating by telling me to pick up a book, can you please tell me which one? Wow science, which science?
MsTorrence
wrote on April 20 2009 @ 01:39 pm: [report]
@Chee…se: You don’t know how to research? When I find the book, I will definitely post it. Apparently you never wrote your own papers in school.
retro chic
wrote on April 20 2009 @ 01:59 pm: [report]
Anyhoo, enough of the judging and defensiveness, and back to the article on the Web site. They also share content/images, and do need 2 confirmations, one visual (csi-type ruler/subject pic), one personal reference. You’re kicked off for misrepresentation—at some point the jig is up if you lie. The more I read, the more I’m meh… I’ll stick to my 7th sense.
kristy1584
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 12:49 pm: [report]
Who cares what size his penis is?? If he knows what he’s doing he can please you, period. Sometimes bigger is def not better, there is a such thing as too big. Trust me! I prefer 6 inches to 9 inches anyday! Oh but I cant complain about that website bc men do it all the time, women with big breasts, women who are size 0, etc.
roastchicken
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 12:58 pm: [report]
Personally, I prefer a guy to be between 7 to 9 inches. But that’s just me.
develange
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 06:36 pm: [report]
I don’t go around measuring guys’ peens, and no one has told me their measurement since high school. I usually say 7 is ideal, but upon actually looking a ruler, that’s kinda f’ing big. Maybe my vagina is small. Maybe I should whip out my measuring tape next time I see my bf.
I must say though, once experiencing a bigger (whatever that may be) dude, it has been difficult to go back to smaller. But I’m sure there are many other factors involved.
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 07:03 pm: [report]
As a note, these links are to the Lifestyles 2001 Cancun Mexico study with 300 effective measurements as the sample size, the largest on record (Pun).
Length:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Penis_frequency.svg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Penis_percentile.svg
This shows that roughly 90% of the population falls between 5 and 7”.
Width:
(A bit less clear, but more important imo)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Penis_circum.svg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Penis_circum_percentile.svg
This shows that 80% fall between 4 and 5.5”.
All from wikipedia, a good read if you’re bored.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_penis_size
Michael
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 07:31 pm: [report]
soooooooo what if you’re not a 7 in length, but you are a 7 in girth?
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 07:38 pm: [report]
@Michael: Considering that a soda can is around 8, you would hurt some young woman.
Michael
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 08:12 pm: [report]
KY is my friend
roastchicken
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 08:45 pm: [report]
@Develange: Women don’t really have small vaginas..unless there is a congential defect. Our vj’s are about 4” in length (before arousal), but then lengthens during arousal.
@Michael: 7in in girth? That’s insanely scary.
For the most part, I’ve been lucky enough to have guys that usually fall between 7 to 9 in length. There was a noticable diffrence when I’ve slept with guys that are under 7. They just can’t give me that full feeling that I crave.
ChoJinn
wrote on April 21 2009 @ 09:28 pm: [report]
Anything that keeps people from wasting their time sounds good to me. Though I’d find it rather embarrassing to say my legitimate relationship was started because of my ad on 7orbetter.com, if it helps women weed out those who they feel would be inadequate for some horsing around: more power to them. Now how about someone start a 5foot10onetwentyfiveorbetter.com for us?
Michael
wrote on April 22 2009 @ 05:43 am: [report]
@roastchicken - I’ll admit that 7” is rounding up. But I never thought it was unusual till one girlfriend was determined to prove it to me. Came in at 6.75” around (about 6” on the dot long) and she had to find the averages online for me to buy that it was thicker than average.
Empresslicious
wrote on April 22 2009 @ 12:21 pm: [report]
Actually, I think I shall pass on those 7 inches or bigger.
RichieRich
wrote on April 23 2009 @ 01:54 pm: [report]
Being a “big guy” makes me somewhat uncomfortable because there are times when I hurt my wife with my size and girth. It never really made a difference to me until I got married and started having sex on a regular basis. Now I ask her when we are done having sex, “Are you OK? Did I hurt you?” I just try to be careful with her.
DigitalBath
wrote on April 23 2009 @ 08:58 pm: [report]
Honestly? I have no problem with this website. Guys, in general, know exactly what they are getting as a package on the first date. They get the first physical impression which includes facial attractiveness, bust size, butt size, etc… If women want to know the size of a man’s package, they can only hope that the man wears tighter fitting pants. All this website does is offer women the right of knowing that the man they are going to meet (not meat) is physically what they are looking for. Nothing wrong with that.