Ralph Lauren’s Photoshop FAIL Is Not An Isolated Incident
Posted by: Amelia McDonell-Parry
Filed in:
style
8:20AM, Thursday October 15th 2009
Despite expressing dismay that the previous ad—featuring an extremely whittled-down Filippa Hamilton—had made it to print and that it didn’t represent their “image,” it’s not the only example of Ralph Lauren execs being a bit overzealous with Photoshop. Check out this ad from a Ralph Lauren window display in Sydney. Mmm, doesn’t she look hungry and chic? [Photoshop Disasters]
TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
lawyrgrl
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 08:08 am: [report]
Alien chic?
AgentBeryllium
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 09:18 am: [report]
You took the words out of my mouth.
Raugiel
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 11:52 am: [report]
The way the legs look like they belong to a 12 year old and the hand is normal sized…. SO CREEPY!!!!!
neongh0st
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 03:29 pm: [report]
Michelangelo’s David gone wrong, anyone?
marykerry
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 03:31 pm: [report]
How did they think this would fool anybody? It’s obvious that she’s not naturally that misshapen.
joyy
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 03:33 pm: [report]
she looks like she’s going to fall over
Raugiel
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 06:24 pm: [report]
Scary thought: Someone thought this looked GOOD.
Anniushka
wrote on October 15 2009 @ 11:29 pm: [report]
@Raugiel: Yeah. Yiiiiikes. She looks like an image in a carnival mirror.
DancerNinja
wrote on October 16 2009 @ 12:31 am: [report]
It’s foreshortening. She is actually really tall and leaning towards the camera. Those hips are about 40 meters away. That’s why her shoulders look proportional to her head, too.
CaleeKay
wrote on October 16 2009 @ 12:53 am: [report]
totally not ‘shoped. i can tell by the pixels..
CaleeKay
wrote on October 16 2009 @ 12:56 am: [report]
‘shopped ***
retro chic
wrote on October 16 2009 @ 03:18 am: [report]
Totally is. That’s some “Skewed” pixel squeezing over the whole image below the neck, widest at the top; narrowest at the bottom. The added PS darker shadows on the sides camo the bending of the lines on the wall from the Skewing.
Nora
wrote on November 3 2009 @ 09:29 pm: [report]
Wow. This is really creepy! It looks so.. wrong. Just very very wrong.