(Another) Quote Of The Day: Cindy Crawford Couldn’t Be A Model Today
Posted by: Jessica Wakeman
Filed in:
celebs
9:40AM, Thursday October 29th 2009
“I would not have become a supermodel in 2009. I look too healthy.”
—Supermodel Cindy Crawford disses the 100-lb models who are en vogue right now. But what we really want to know is how kind would modeling agents of 2009 be to facial moles? [Telegraph UK]
TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
Keesh Mia
wrote on October 29 2009 @ 08:56 am: [report]
I think Cindy Crawford had a similar build as Gisele Bundchen. If Cindy were 26 now, she’d still be a super model.
MuchoMacho
wrote on October 29 2009 @ 08:58 am: [report]
i remember some movie she was in where she got topless from when i was a kid. still in love.
Christinaval
wrote on October 29 2009 @ 11:18 am: [report]
Honestly Keesh I’m really not sure if she was ever THAT skinny (Gisele skinny). Maybe Marisa Miller? But even still, those are Victoria’s Secret models…they always have big breasts and a little extra in the rump. They look healthy. The kinds of models that you see in magazine ads and on the runway, are not anywhere close to what Cindy EVER was in size.
canadiancutie
wrote on October 30 2009 @ 07:42 am: [report]
Gisele & Marisa are far skinnier than Cindy used to be. I’ve seen a pic of Marisa Miller that is unairbrushed where she’s looking down and her ribs are clearly visible, razor-sharp hipbones. If I could be bothered to find it right now I’d post the link. Gisele is straightup-and-down. No, Cindy, in her heyday, DID look healthy - she had thighs and muscle mass. I really don’t know what she’s talking about. The Claudia Schiffers and Cindy Crawfords of 1990 looked healthier and more athletic than anything we’ve seen in modelling since.