No More Little “Miss Sexy” Pants
Posted by: Lily Q
Filed in:
style
10:50AM, Wednesday October 7th 2009
Apparently, “Miss Sexy” pants are a little too, well, sexy for English school masters to stomach. The Nailsea School near Bristol, England has officially banned the $18, super-tight black trousers, deeming the VPLs (visible panty lines) and “Miss Sexy” label inappropriate for the young ladies who are so fond of them. As the “Miss Sexy”-wearing girl at left is suggesting with her pout, this decision is unlikely to be greeted with much enthusiasm by the skin-tight-pants-wearing student body at Nailsea. She looks about as pissed as “Gossip Girl” Jenny Humphrey might if her school told her she had to stop wearing shirts as dresses and actually vaguely conform to their uniform. Yikes. [Daily Mail]
TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
_jsw_
wrote on October 7 2009 @ 09:54 am: [report]
Looking at the pics in the link, I think she looks a lot better wearing the approved outfit.
chickenhead
wrote on October 7 2009 @ 10:11 am: [report]
Girls should wear SKIRTS! Are they trying to breed an entire generation of lesbians over there or something???
323Felicity
wrote on October 7 2009 @ 11:04 am: [report]
I personally don’t see much wrong with these pants. I could see where the Miss Sexy label might send the wrong message, but I couldn’t see the label in any of the photos. And the one girl’s mom was right about the approved pants not fitting right, they were too short for her.
Casper
wrote on October 7 2009 @ 02:57 pm: [report]
I’d just rip the label off my trousers, that way they couldn’t complain about the brand. The school shop uniforms aren’t usually great quality and are extremely over priced, the ones pictured are not a good fit and totally not worth the £17. I can go to topshop or primark and get a pair i like for half that price, some parents cant afford the price of the school trousers on top of the school fleece or jumper and PE kit. It cost me a fortune for my uniform and i didn’t have to buy the school trousers, the rest of it cost enough. Also, how are the teachers noticing the VPL? They should be concentrating more on teaching that checking out student ass.
Lynn
wrote on October 7 2009 @ 03:59 pm: [report]
Eh. I don’t think this is a big deal. The Miss Sexy pants do look too tight, and it didn’t sound like those short ones were the ONLY option, just that they were AN option. Plus those Miss Sexy ones look sloppy.
My high school had a strict dress code and we also couldn’t wear pants like this, with a brand name on it and extra hardware and it being tight. And we came out alive. And our parents didn’t bitch about it because the school rules are more important than wearing whatever kind of label you like the best. I can see the girls complaining because they’re like 14 and probably have nothing better to worry about than how their ass looks, but the parents? Why are they wasting any time on this?
canadiancutie
wrote on October 8 2009 @ 08:48 pm: [report]
LOL I like the “wt” category because when I saw this headline I immediately thought to myself, “what the f**k??!”
Iammina
wrote on October 9 2009 @ 05:41 pm: [report]
I love skinny jeans. There are certain panties that don’t leave a panty line or just don’t wear panties at all. The only problem with wearing no panties is the dreaded “camel toe” which is the only problem I have with tight jeans.