Massachusetts Teen Pregnancy Pact A Total Sham?
So, remember that teen pregnancy pact story we wrote about yesterday that was featured in Time? Well, one of our frequent commenters, Go-To-Girl, pointed us to a blog post she wrote where she theorizes that the pact story is actually a bit of a scam. After doing some serious number crunching and some nosing around the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy’s statistic, Go-To-Girl figured out that the percentage of teen pregnancies that the school reflects is actually lower than the lowest state pregnancy rate in the nation (North Dakota)—which she says blows a hole in the “pregnancy outbreak” story hook. Additionally, the pact aspect is also in question according to Go-To-Girl’s research. More info, after the jump…
While the story got national attention when it was featured on CNN and in Time, the original reporting on the story in the Glouchester Daily Times only mentions “intentional” pregnancy here:
To get to the bottom of the problem, Sullivan investigated and came up with a startling revelation: According to his conversations with upperclassmen, some younger students may be becoming pregnant on purpose. Kim Daly, nurse practitioner for the high school, was unable to confirm specifics but did say that the majority of students reporting pregnancies this school year were in the younger grades.
If all this information is accurate, why the sudden frenzy over a “pact” made by teens to “intentionally” get pregnant? Go-To-Girl’s theory is that “health education funding has been cut at Gloucester High, and the school’s board will vote this fall on whether to provide contraception in its school clinic.” She seems to imply that a fuss is being made in order to use it as an example of why contraception should be offered and other news outlets didn’t do additional reporting or get interviews with the pregnant girls to support the claim that there was a pact to begin with.
Regardless, I am confused about one thing—if, indeed, 17 girls got pregnant on accident, rather than on purpose, at Gloucester High School, isn’t that a much better example of why this school is in need of available contraception? If you’re trying to get pregnant on purpose, you don’t use birth control. Anyway, we’re interested in hearing your thoughts, and thanks to Go-To-Girl for passing along her theory. [MsGoToGirl]


















TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
Elle
wrote on June 21 2008 @ 09:15 pm: [report]
I think condoms should be free to teens under 18 no matter what. If they walk into a store and want to get condoms they should be able to get them for free, especially from a pharmacy. I don’t necessarily think it’s the school’s job to dispense contraception, but it is a more responsible thing to do and I can’t imagine any condom company out there not wanting to partner with a school to distribute their condoms for free.
ariel
wrote on June 23 2008 @ 01:49 am: [report]
Turns out the Gloucester movie theater only shows one movie at a time… which movie came out about 6 months ago, that’s right, JUNO! Blame the movies! I think we should really push the promise ring idea in our schools today. Everyone knows that the only safe way to prevent the creation of more humans is celibacy and swallowing. I think the Evangelicals need a stronger presence in the northeast. Amen.
LovesIt
wrote on June 23 2008 @ 07:04 am: [report]
“Your mouth can’t get pregnant” -Tina Fey
high schools
wrote on June 7 2009 @ 10:07 pm: [report]
There are several <A >affordable teens high schools</A> in country which are licensed by state government and are providing rigorous academic and outdoor programs for students. These schools have highly motivated and dedicated faculties that are working hard not only for academic excellence of students but also for their spiritual and moral development.