Love Is Just A Combination Of Chemicals In Our Brains
Love seems elusive. Sure, we’ve loved and been in love, but we’ve never known exactly why or how it happens, or if we love one person differently than another. But that could soon change. Writer A.J. Jacobs underwent an MRI while looking at photos of his wife and Angelina Jolie so scientists could study his brain activity. They believe love is the result of a “chemical cocktail,” as Jacobs calls it, based on a person’s sex drive, and feelings of attachment.
Jacobs looks at photos of his wife that represent the three proposed elements of love, and an MRI captures what his brain is up to when he sees them. Then, he looked at photos of Angelina Jolie. By comparing the two, neuroscientist Lucy Brown found that his brain shows that he’s not head-over-heels in love, as is expected of someone who has been married for several years, but that he’s still hot for his wife and has romantic feelings for her. Jacobs and his wife thought he would be more sexually attracted to Angelina, but that wasn’t the case. Jacobs didn’t find Jolie any more attractive than Julie, and he didn’t feel romantic love for the star. The three brain areas associated with love are related, so Julie’s overall scores added up to more than Angelina’s as the actress scored low in the attachment area. However, Jacobs’ brain activity while looking at Angelina was very similar to when he looked at photos of his wife. Close, but no cigar, which is probably good for Jacobs’ home and bedroom life. We’re just glad to have an explanation for how we can have strong feelings for Ryan Gosling and our boyfriends. [Esquire]

















TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
Humble Bee
wrote on May 18 2009 @ 02:22 pm: [report]
you say that too?
I have never met anyone who says close, but no cigar.
lol.
I also read somewhere (might have been here) that there REALLY is a thin line between love and hate in our brains.
One day we can love someone to death, and the next they can do something that makes you want to kill them.
Muttface
wrote on May 18 2009 @ 05:42 pm: [report]
Scientist have always been trying to analyze the “love” feeling and have found links to certain stimuli,neurotransmitters, and regions of the brain. However, during a conversation in my undergrad molecular biology course I remember hearing how even if it was possible to build a machine that could respond the same way we do to various stimuli and replicate our cerebral responses, would it still feel “love” as we do. Meaning, if you look at something purple, there is some sort of psychological reference you have that allows you to experience that particular color. But would it be the same if experienced by some other organism or machine?
DancerNinja
wrote on May 19 2009 @ 07:17 am: [report]
Muttface, interesting thought, but it just seems so far off. I’m no neuroscientist, but I don’t think we really know what this “raise in activity” actually means. The up-regulation in electrical/ neurochemical signals really do what? At what point do these chemical reactions become awareness? And if we figure that out, why couldn’t we create something to feel like we do? Would that really cheapen the experience?