Jennifer Aniston Takes Her Clothes Off, Just Not For Playboy
Posted by: Simcha Whitehill
Filed in:
celebs
5:30PM, Wednesday January 28th 2009
In the January issue of GQ, Jennifer posed on the cover wearing nothing but a man’s tie to match her birthday suit. After seeing her cover, Playboy’s head, Hugh Hefner, said , “Is it just me or is Jennifer Aniston getting hotter?...Never seen her in this light before.” Whoa, easy there sparky! But according to a Playboy spokesperson, Hef just had to ask if he could have her for his mag and offered her $4 million plus a bonus for sales that could earn her up to $10 million if she agreed to pose nude! Wow, I can barely get a dude to buy me a drink before we get nekkid. However, All American Aniston doesn’t literally want to be a “Girl Next Door.” So, she turned Hef down, even though she told GQ “Yes” for a heck of a lot less dough. Alas, the cougar has decided to keep her clothes on, this time. But maybe she should reconsider, after all, that’s a whole lot of neck ties, Jen. [Celebrity Smack]
TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
Humble Bee
wrote on January 29 2009 @ 12:01 pm: [report]
lol Simcha. I know she already got Naked for GQ, but when you think “playboy” you think slut(well atleast i do) . Maybe she doesn’t want to fall into the Pamela Anderson category. She DOES have a lot of money already, I’m pretty sure she’s not money hungry. I think the poses in playboy will be alot more graphic than GQ’s. Its a tough one though. If she did it, that thing would sell no matter what economic depression we’re in.
CuteCora
wrote on February 12 2009 @ 01:15 pm: [report]
Disagree, Playboy can actually be considered one of the most classiest poses for nude pics~ Hef has built an amazing empire of beautiful, classy and tasteful women! I think she should go for it, only if she is comfotable and wants to, I would not think any less of her, Flip I would do it!