Hot Chicks Picking Up Dog Doo-Doo
Posted by: Susannah Breslin
Filed in:
celebs
10:10AM, Tuesday September 8th 2009
Ah, men. Really, they can fetishize anything: feet, hair, derrieres, cars, sneakers. You name it, there’s a guy out there who joneses for it. Now, there’s a blog just for men who are really into hot chicks picking up dog poop. Somewhere out there, a guy has spent his entire life dreaming of a catalog of celebrities and other random good-looking women bending over, crouching down, and hunkering about to pick up their pooch’s doo-doo with plastic bags, tiny shovels, and the like, and his lucky day has arrived. The glamorous stars of HCPUDS include Gisele Bundchen, Maria Bello, and Leighton Meester. What’s next—a book deal followed by “HCPUDS: The Movie”?
TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
_jsw_
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 09:19 am: [report]
That’s disgusting and vile. It’s totally different than wanting to watch them clean their kitty’s litter box. Now that? <i>That<i> is powerfully erotic.
joyy
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 09:21 am: [report]
Maybe this is just the flipside to the whole ‘nothing is sexier than a man doing housework’ phenomenon.
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 09:25 am: [report]
While women fawn over handbags and shoes…we fetishize everything. God damn I do love redheads though.
Welcome to the jungle baby.
retro chic
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 09:39 am: [report]
^Everything? Would a “hot chick” changing a baby diaper give you the same buzz? [heehee. thought not.]
This is only the flipside to men’s fetishes about hot chicks picking up cat poop.
_jsw_
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 09:42 am: [report]
@retro chic: Yes, the hot chick changing the diaper would give me good feelings down under… assuming that she was with me. Nurturing abilities are hot in either sex (well, to a point).
_jsw_
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 09:44 am: [report]
Clarification: the diaper change would be done with a baby, not me. The hot chick would be in a relationship with me that did not involve diapers. Except for the baby. And no, neither of us would role play as “babies”.
retro chic
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 09:52 am: [report]
I think most would agree with you, jsw. Pampering a child: good. For some frisky adults: just Depends.
_jsw_
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 09:56 am: [report]
@retro chic: You made me spit coffee. You suck.
And I just wanted to be clear: I’m personally not into diaper play, but some people are. Others seem to get all bent out of shape by it, but I don’t see why there’s such a big stink.
retro chic
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 10:04 am: [report]
^Huh? Please, I was *agreeing* with you! No need for coffee watersports!
And yes, I do suck, about two nights ago – he liked, but I don’t like him anymore, so now he sucks. For another post…
_jsw_
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 10:09 am: [report]
He sucks another “post”?
Wow, that really would make for an interesting story.
retro chic
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 10:40 am: [report]
^ hardy har-har. You can do better than that! You have me spoiled with your evocatively clever fare. Is this really you?
And, I’m still waiting for CheeeeEEEEse to respond to my original comment, ¶1, directed to him.
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 10:43 am: [report]
@retro chic: You want me to reveal my secret shame or something. Well not gonna happen! I’ll only stick to feet publicly.
retro chic
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 10:49 am: [report]
@CheeeeEEEEse: No, silly just my original response to your comment that men fetishize about *everything.* Then I said: “^Everything? Would a “hot chick” changing a baby diaper give you the same buzz?”
You can hold on to your secrets, tho, I suspect we’re all onto a few…
_jsw_
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 10:51 am: [report]
@retro chic: I knew it was lame even as I submitted it.
I’ll take into consideration the concept of thinking prior to writing and proofreading prior to submitting, but I fear I’ll never catch up to you and Chedda if I do that.
@CheeeeEEEEse: I won’t even bother detailing the things that unfortunately came to mind when I saw your “stick to feet” comment.
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on September 8 2009 @ 10:55 am: [report]
@retro chic: I don’t put anything past men, we are dirty dirty creatures. Both figuratively and literally. Also, down with proofreading!
hotchickseatingtacos
wrote on September 9 2009 @ 01:43 pm: [report]
hot chicks eating tacos is better. lol
http://www.hotchickseatingtacos.com
Buzzman
wrote on September 14 2009 @ 07:28 am: [report]
IF YOU LIKE HOT CHICKS WITH, CHEKS THAT
http://www.buzzman-tv.com/good-stuff/une-jolie-fille-peut-elle-manger-des-tacos/
It’s all Hot Chicks With a lot of stupid things.
SO FUNNY ! :-D
Perceptible
wrote on September 14 2009 @ 12:13 pm: [report]
Umm… why?!
But perhaps men can’t understand why a book of “women’s porn” is just a collection of scantily-clad, muscle-y guys doing household chores. Now THAT’S hot!