Gisele’s Airbrushing Gone Horribly Wrong
Come to think of it, it’s hard to think of an example of airbrushing gone right, but this London Fog incident is certainly disturbing. According to WWD, the company, which shot the campaign at the beginning of Gisele’s pregnancy, decided to erase her pregnant stomach in order to “respect her privacy.” It seems parent corporation Iconix, who also owns Rampage, transferred the supermodel to their London Fog division so she could wear trench coats instead of tight-fitting jeans. Is this some kind of bizarre maternity discrimination? If they were so concerned about hiding her pregnancy, why did they have to shoot her naked beneath said coat? And most importantly, how freakin’ weird does this ad look? [WWD]


















TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
Coral
wrote on July 29 2009 @ 12:21 pm: [report]
Her shoulder looks very strange in this ad.
Rose
wrote on July 29 2009 @ 04:32 pm: [report]
@Coral - Just her shoulders?! Everything about her looks very strange. Her hand on her hip looks weird, her chest/breasts look weird, the obvious airbrushing where her crotch should be looks freaky-weird. How’s anyone supposed to notice the trench coat with all that going on?
Coral
wrote on July 29 2009 @ 06:15 pm: [report]
@Rose: Oh, I totally agree. It’s just that the stark contrast in values between her shoulder and her neck area was one of the many things that caught me off guard.