Famous Bisexuals | The Frisky

Is Bisexuality The Next Big Thing In Hollywood?

Posted by: Ami Angelowicz Filed in: celebs, galleries
3:30PM, Thursday May 21st 2009

1 of 8
Next

Fergie

“Wait! Don’t forget about me!” That’s Fergie running to catch the fame train that’s pulling out of the station without her. In a recent interview, Fergie revealed she’s bisexual. “I’ve experimented, definitely,” she said. “But I’ve never had a steady girlfriend.”

Fergie is one of many celebs hopping on the bi-bandwagon. Check out some other celebs that don’t discriminate in bed.

1 of 8
Next

comments

Tensai
wrote on May 21 2009 @ 03:38 pm: [report]

Bisexual? Great, whatever. I do feel like the trend for a certain level of star right now to profess their supposed dual sexual character. Sells magazines. When done transparently for cash it just stinks cheap and rotten to me though.

Humble Bee
wrote on May 21 2009 @ 04:00 pm: [report]

I don’t know why people make it a big deal. I’m sure a lot of people have experimented with the same sex (famous or not), I know I have in HS. It was fun, but nothing that I took serious because I love men. I think the media just blows it up like this big bad thing,It’s not, it happens. Drunk or not.

spark
wrote on May 21 2009 @ 05:44 pm: [report]

just a ploy with attention. stoopid.

lilo
wrote on May 21 2009 @ 05:51 pm: [report]

Snogging has two “g’s”

It means “make out.”

retro chic
wrote on May 21 2009 @ 06:04 pm: [report]

Are there bi-dude offerings here? Also, some of the celeb comments make it sound more “try-sexual” than truly bi where relationships or love are concerned. As for Madonna… I think she’s omni/pan.

ChoJinn
wrote on May 21 2009 @ 08:26 pm: [report]

not sure how to follow that last post, Choco, but yah: all this “bisexuality” is total b.s.. Whatever sells magazines, definitely. That being said, Kanye West is a very tormented gay man. If there was anyone pan/hypersexual, it would probably be Prince. Madonna at this point probably just wants to stop trying so hard to stay relevant.

jedichica
wrote on May 22 2009 @ 05:31 am: [report]

This situation is personal to me. In my mid 20’s, I met and fell for a gay girl. Never was “bi”, “gay”,“curious” before. I dated and lived with her for a few years. It was a wonderful relationship.

I received a lot of flack from the gay and straight community forcing to me to attempt to label, for them, not for me, my sexuality. Much like Lindsay Lohan, I didn’t feel the need to.

Some of me didn’t want to be labeled with people’s perception of the term bisexual.

I think it’s so hard to be bisexual. Its not taken seriously, it can carry a promiscuous stigma, and generally gets a bad name. These ignorant misconceptions are false.

We tend to still accept “gay” or “lesbian” or “straight”, but bisexual is considered a grasp for attention or experimental?

Angelina Jolie, and Lindsay Lohen are not fooling around for attention. I don’t think they should be grouped in with Fergie, who has admittedly experimented only.

There is a difference between “barsexual”, “Bicurious” and “bisexual”. The latter is not a joke, or a ploy for attention. It’s peoples lives.

GreenAura
wrote on May 22 2009 @ 11:17 am: [report]

Can’t we just let people be whoever they want without affixing a specific label to them? Sexual orientation shouldnt garner a label, just as race, ethnicity, handicap, religion, age or gender shouldn’t. Afterall, we’re ALL already wearing a label…HUMAN!

hereshestands
wrote on May 24 2009 @ 02:39 am: [report]

We say that we don’t judge but yet people get all thingy about this stuff. But I do agree that everyone is suddenly coming out of the closet. Maybe it’s just that it is much more accepted now.