Frisky RSS Frisky on Google
relationships swag bag relationships what's viral
relationships

Frisky Rant: Should Women Use Sex As A Power Tool In Relationships?

Comments (6)
Bookmark and Share

This past week on VH1’s “Tool Academy,” the dudes were taught humility by admitting their deepest fears about their relationships and prancing around in tutus.  However, their girlfriends have been trying to put them in their place since the season began by withholding sex. Granted, none of those bros deserve a piece of their girl’s promise land, since they’ve been complete bastards, but if these ladies are willing to stand by their jerky boyfriends while they man up, what’s the point of not having sexy times?!  It simply turns sex into a control issue. However, these “Tool”-ettes are not alone in their belief that keeping their legs closed for business will bring about a positive change in their love life.  The question is, does denying what you both need—sex—get you what you want—a good relationship?

Case in point, on “Tool Academy,” Shawn, the winner of the bake sale challenge, worked so hard to prove to his girl that he indeed loves her and is willing to fight for her even at the cost of his public appearance.  Because of his successful self-sacrifice, he won his girlfriend, Aida, a princess themed date: a carriage ride that culminated in a highly coveted conjugal visit. After bunking up with a bunch of dudes, these guys salivate at even the chance for some alone time with their lady.  However, like fellow “Tool” Matsuflex before him (whose GF has been withholding sex for their entire long term relationship), Shawn didn’t get any when they got into the bedroom. While his girlfriend admitted to wanting it too, she asked him why it always had to be about that and didn’t she deserve to be a princess for one day?! He replied with a befuddled “Yes,” but I, as a woman, was confused too.  Why hold back now?  What kind of mystical, hypnotic influence does she think her vag holds?  Is she setting herself up for failure by putting sex with her on a pedestal they both can’t seem to reach? But instead of asking her these questions, he went back home to the men’s bunk and nearly beat the crap out of another dude to get out his frustration (see above video).  Violence is not the answer, people.

Here at The Frisky, we’ve been debating a similar sex question that touches the same kind of control issue—whether or not a woman should have sex on date number one if she wants something more than a one-night-stand.  Do we really need to dangle that carrot to keep a man interested in us?  A bunch of you, like “V for Vixen,” chimed into say you dated for years or married people who you slept with immediately. On the other hand, in the UK, a mathematical study just “discovered” that a guy who has sex on the first date probably is a bad mate.  But does keeping his Jackson out of action really change the kind of man that he is? If he’s really only interested in having sex with you, does dragging it out with dates make it any easier or better when you do finally have sex and then he never calls again? Sure, if you ask your grandma, she’ll probably tell you not to do the nasty immediately under any circumstances, but is that really ancient wisdom or just the conventional, potentially outdated kind?  No one wants to completely let their heart and hormones dictate their love lives when the biggest erogenous zone is your brain, but there’s got to be a balance.

Power corrupts and nothing is worse than relying on your vagina just so you can have clout in your relationship. Abusing your wonderland like that is pathetic. Just look at “Tool Academy”‘s Matsuflex! It’s completely rotted his relationship with his girlfriend.  Because she hasn’t ever had sex with him since she thinks she’ll lose the upperhand in the relationship, it’s all he is fixated on and has even admitted to cheating. Now, it’s one thing if you’re not feeling a guy and your don’t want to put out for that reason. We should never have obligatory sex because it’s always lame! However, if you’re not having sex with him to either punish him or to make him work harder, you’re actually hurting yourself more.  It degrades your whole she-bang when it’s reduced to being a mere instrument of authority. You can’t go around ruling sex like you’re the Czar of Cooter when it takes two to tango! 

If sex is used solely as a reward, it makes making love even more out of your control because then he just has to do those few obedient things to get it out of you. Your vagina is not for cashing IOU’s!  Our mothers have, for centuries, fought for us to have just as many rights and the same value in society as men.  Why should we negate all their hard work now that we’ve reached (or are close to) that equality by attributing our sole value in a relationship to a (man)hole in our underpants? You should feel free to speak your mind at all times and share yourself when you want to, that’s what a true partnership is. 

“Tool Academy” was meant to inspire bros who act like complete douchebags and treat their girlfriends like pieces of meat.  However, if both the men and the women are going to graduate and take their relationship to the next level, they have to start seeing themselves as more than just objects of desire and their love affair as more than just sex.  So, while the show’s producers have been focusing all their attention on the dudes and their many, many issues, I think it’s time to turn the tables on the ladies and start giving them the self-esteem they need to see that they’re more than just holes to be filled by a man.  That would be the true tool they’ll need the rest of their lives.

Tags: frisky rant, tool academy, sexual relations, power

Comments (6)
Bookmark and Share
comments
anoldguy's avatar

anoldguy
wrote on January 27 2009 @ 05:19 pm: [report]

“The question is, does denying what you both need—sex—get you what you want—a good relationship?” In short: no.

At least, it’s not going to work if you use it consciously as a kind of long-term strategy. If he’s as much of an idiot as the guy pictured, I could certainly understand deciding you wanted nothing to do with him for a night, or a lifetime, but if it’s “17 nights, until he learns his lesson,” there’s a whole lot of other stuff wrong with the relationship that you’re apparently not addressing.

I married badly, twice, and both ex-wives used this ploy. After arguments, therapy, tips from friends, and whatever else you might want to try, if you insist on using your vagina as a tool with which to beat your guy over the head (wow, there’s a mangled metaphor if I’ve ever written one… the visual imagery is pretty confusing), he’s going to get tired of it, probably very quickly, and will just as quickly be looking elsewhere.

And, to piggyback on a line in the Frisky Rant, if sex is used solely as a reward, not only will Dr. Pavlov roll over in his grave, you’ll have changed the relationship from a partnership into something approaching a commercial deal. Sorry, even when I was decades younger, that didn’t appeal to me.


Holly Page's avatar

Holly Page
wrote on January 27 2009 @ 06:09 pm: [report]

“Why should we negate all their hard work now that we’ve reached (or are close to) that equality by attributing our sole value in a relationship to a (man)hole in our underpants?” Yes! Ugh. I hate the “withholding sex as punishment” crap. It’s degrading to the woman doing it, as if she wasn’t entitled to affection and sexual pleasure, and disrespectful to her partner, as if his desire for her is there to be exploited. 

Compromise is a part of a sexual relationship, but not negotiation, as in “I’ll go down on you if you do the dishes.”


theothergyllenhaal's avatar

theothergyllenhaal
wrote on January 27 2009 @ 06:30 pm: [report]

If sex were a power tool, what kind of a power tool would it be?

I think sex would be a jointer. It’s a great tool to have, but not much good if you don’t already have the basics.


CheeeeEEEEse's avatar

CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on January 27 2009 @ 09:34 pm: [report]

Does it have to be a power tool, I think it’s like caulk. Awesome if applied correctly, but hideous if done wrong.


grownwoman's avatar

grownwoman
wrote on January 29 2009 @ 01:01 pm: [report]

Here’s the deal, if you are having a conflict, why would you want to have physical intimacy with the person who is causing you grief?  Sometimes sex can be a tool to end the conflict but it really depends on what is going on.  If the grievance is continuous bad behavior like, let’s say cheating, or gambling the family money creating stress or deliberately behaving in a way that causes discord, then withholding sex is not a tool but rather a response.  It cannot even be characterized as conscious withholding, it is a lack of desire to allow that level of closeness until it is deserved by showing true caring and concern for each other and the relationship.  Would you continue to receive a paycheck if you constantly missed work or did not complete your tasks?  So articles like this are an insult to women and in fact are turning them into nothing more than vaginas and not people.  Sex needs to have value or we are just animals - I vote for civilization.


Yug_Zohoth's avatar

Yug_Zohoth
wrote on September 22 2009 @ 06:08 pm: [report]

Sorry grownwoman, but we ARE animals when you really get down to it. Futhermore, the fact that drew an analogy to working for a paycheck shows that you have a pretty warped view of relationships.A (romantic)relationship is Not a business transaction!And the very idea of women exchanging sex for affection, attention, and material wealth makes *love* seem so cheap and vulgar. If my gf decided to withhold sex from me because she’s mad at me or makes it contingent on getting something else I will respond by getting sex elsewhere(i.e., CHEATING). If you women regard sex as a form of currency then don’t come home crying when you find out your guy has been cheating on you. However, if he has been cheating first then refusing to have sex is justifiable. So if you exchange sexual currency then it’s to be expected that your relationship will be over sooner rather than later.


Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment on The Frisky.

Username:
Password:
 

Auto-login on future visits
Show my name in the online users list

 

  register | forgotten password


frisky poll

frisky friends