Forget-Me-Not Panties: For The Man Who Wants To Keep Tabs On His Naked Wife/Daughter
Posted by: Amelia McDonell-Parry
Filed in:
style
11:10AM, Wednesday November 4th 2009
The only good reason I can come up with for GPS panties is if they had a little pocket where you could store your little baggie of diamonds or other valuables. That way, if you left the panties somewhere and needed to find them again, the GPS would be able to help. But that is not the reason Panchira Corp. created Forget-Me-Not Panties! No, their reasons are far more stalker-y. Their motto is “protect her privates,” and the panties are for dudes to give as gifts to the women in their lives—when they suspect they could be cheating or coming home late at night. The GPS transmits the info to a cell phone and can even measure heart rate and temperature levels. That way these freaky, suspicious dudes can know when their girlfriends are hot and horny. If all that’s not creepy enough, check out the two testimonials on the site, after the jump.
TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
Perceptible
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:20 am: [report]
I know it sounds a little creepy, but I immediately thought of my bf’s daughter who can’t seem to keep herself out of trouble. These would be great for us to be able to have some peace of mind.
spatula
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:21 am: [report]
“RATHER than becoming an overprotective parent”?! Should include a video camera? Do you REALLY want a video camera on your daughter’s panties?!! Dude you are siiick. These people are freaks.
This is insane!! It’s a modern chastity belt. How is this legal?!
belongsomewhere
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:21 am: [report]
The father’s account is so disturbing! That takes paranoia about virginity protection to an even creepier new level, which I didn’t think was possible. Ew.
camille905
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:24 am: [report]
These are super creepy. Also when I was adolescent (and even now!) it didn’t take any source other than MY MIND to get me hot and bothered.
If you significant other or child has a cell phone, most of those have a GPS function. Be disturbing in a way that does not involve your loved one’s panties.
RobinUncommon
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:26 am: [report]
Too bad this item is fake. If you actually clicked on the link to purchase a pair, you get some stupid message stating you’ve been duped.
C.Munro
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:26 am: [report]
I can see the advertising tagline already. “When mandatory parental notification is not enough ....”
MuchoMacho
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:29 am: [report]
young girls would quickly learn to go panty-less…
spatula
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:29 am: [report]
@C Munro: Oh please. There is a huge, ridiculous, chasm-like difference between notifying parents of a child’s surgery and sneakily tracking them with their damn underwear. Not even close to comparable.
Riley
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:30 am: [report]
I just low-jack the women I see with a sub-dermal tracking device. Much easier. It also comes with a cyanide pill inside the device, which has come in handy more times than I can count.
sparklestar
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:31 am: [report]
It’s a fake, why is this even up here??
spatula
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:31 am: [report]
Also, how creeped out would you be if you were a teenage girl and your DAD was like “I bought you these super cool new panties, make sure you wear them whenever you go out with boys. What? Oh, just ignore the beeping”
joyy
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:37 am: [report]
Uh, yeah, if you want to track your child, get the chaperone feature on your family cell plan.
pinkjellyfish
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:39 am: [report]
Clever hoax! The ridiculous testimonials were too well-written to be real.
C.Munro
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:41 am: [report]
There is much less of a gap between the kind of people who’d consider either acceptable.
fireflyeyes
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:42 am: [report]
Of course its a hoax. Funny, would make a great post, if the poster had done her research and put it up as such, instead of getting duped. Its not even like they try very hard to hide it being a joke!
MuchoMacho
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:49 am: [report]
@cmun - there is a huge gap. we want to raise independant healthy kids… but as parents, we want to guide their decisions, and hopefully mold them into the kind of adults we want them to become. you do that by being involved, not by washing your hands of them when they become teens.
C.Munro
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 11:58 am: [report]
Parents can seek either control or influence. Those who seek influence have no guarantee that their children won’t still make bad decisions. But those who seek control are virtually guaranteed not to get it.
The similarity in these threads is the lust for control. Anyone who thinks either is a good idea seeks to control their children.
Arsenic
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 12:11 pm: [report]
That is the creepiest thing I’ve ever seen. Thank god it’s a hoax.
wandawonder
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 12:31 pm: [report]
This is a hoax. This should be removed from thefrisky or this article should be updated.
C.Munro
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 12:34 pm: [report]
Of course it’s a hoax. Where do people expect to put the batteries on these things. Wait, don’t answer that ....
Frederica Bimble
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 12:59 pm: [report]
This has got to be a joke! Come on, people! If you can’t see the comment of “wish there was a video camera too” for the silliness that it is, then there isn’t much hope for some.
@ Imperceptible - Huh? Have you ever heard of a little something the rest of the people on this planet call “privacy?”
What’s scarier than fools actually thinking it’s a real advertisement are those who would be willing to inflict their will upon another person.
Hey, folks, if you’re THAT concerned about what your daughter is “up to” then why not just abort the child before she’s born and that way she won’t cause YOU all that pesky trouble…..
Unbelievable.
Frederica Bimble
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 01:02 pm: [report]
Ooooooh, wait a minute. Now, if these drawers WERE real then I guess that keeps the masturbation down to a minimum, eh? One can’t choke the chicken without one’s temperature becoming elevated….......
MuchoMacho
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 01:06 pm: [report]
@fredrica - actually if i was in HS and my mom bought me a boys version of these, once i figured out that she was tracking my masturbation i would have done it all the time, to gross her out enough to quit tracking me…
Mel
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 02:36 pm: [report]
I believed this whole-heartingly until I looked at the pricing page and a flash of GOTCHA! popped up with a link to the people who created the website. Cute hoax.
TinaLish
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 02:46 pm: [report]
If I ever recieve underwear from a significant other, I’m going to be thoroughly checking every inch to make sure it’s not one of these. Hell no! Freaky much?
Morwen
wrote on November 4 2009 @ 06:38 pm: [report]
Actually, I think that site won an award of fake products web sites or something like that, a few years ago. That’s why it’s still online. I freaked out when I first found it.