Bo Men's Vibrator

Bo: The Men’s Vibrator He Can Carry In His Pocket

Posted by: Leonora Epstein Filed in: guys
10:40AM, Tuesday October 27th 2009

Is that a Bo in your pocket or are you just excited to see me? Both. Sort of. Meet Bo, a male vibrator made by Lelo, a company known for its sleek array of designer sex toys. (You might know one of their bestsellers, a USB rechargeable vibrator which looks like a tube of lipstick.) The male version is a discreet “gentleman’s ring” which delivers stimulation through an energetic and vigorous vibration. Bo can be used for joint pleasure during intercourse; however, it seems to be marketed more to solo time. That picture implies that the accessory should become an everyday object, one used so routinely that he could carry it in his pocket along with other necessities like a wallet, pen, and glasses. Ew!

Here’s the thing: If a girl carried around a sex toy in her purse to pleasure herself throughout the day, many guys would find this a turn-on. But a guy who carries a male vibrator in his pocket? Dealbreaker. Amiright? [Lelo]

comments

brandyalexander
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 09:41 am: [report]

Absolutely.

Amy
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 09:43 am: [report]

But a guy who carries a male vibrator in his pocket? Dealbreaker. Amiright?>>

Yeah. Similarly, I just had a guy send me a message via a dating site, and listed as one of his likes was “cunnilingus”. Ew. I mean, I love it *in practice* as much as the next gal, but if a guy thinks stating that (and using that particular word) is a turn-on, he’s clueless.

Perceptible
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 09:43 am: [report]

Hmmm… interesting double standard. Yet true.

CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 09:59 am: [report]

What if I carry a female vibrator with me? Does that make me awesome? Handy? Helpful in some cases?

_jsw_
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 10:23 am: [report]

I don’t see how this could fit. Seems like it’d be too big, or too small, or too circular, or whatnot. I don’t think that men having or using vibrators is any worse that women doing so. I just think that this vibrator isn’t all that useful to all but the few men it will fit. And once it’s on and they’re… aroused, how do you take it off? Ouch!

MuchoMacho
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 10:29 am: [report]

stretchy ones seem like theyd be much more useful…

NomChompsky
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 11:13 am: [report]

“But a guy who carries a male vibrator in his pocket? Dealbreaker.”

What? I keep my hands in my pockets all the time.

Lolafalona
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 11:28 am: [report]

Why do they need a special “toy”? They can just use the tools God gave them, their hands.

bogart4017
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 12:53 pm: [report]

uamright! Some things just belong home in the top left hand drawer.

JennyPurr
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 12:54 pm: [report]

I think it’s awesome.

The band on the Bo is strecthy like most vibrating rings, and practically fits all users. And it’s really intended for couple’s play, not solo use.

So that tell me two things.
1. He’s pretty interested in making sure I get off. If it’s our first time hooking up and he breaks that out- yay! It’s a sign of the good things to come (no pun intended).

2. If we’ve been together for some time, it shows me he’s keen on keeping things adventurous and exciting.

I see no issues with this. But I since I design adult toys, I could be a little biased.

Secret Story Time
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 01:03 pm: [report]

I never knew any guy that used a vibrating device on his PENIS. Anally yes, penis, no. Are there any guys who could give a “product evaluation” on this new self-stimulator toy? Do the horniest males wear it when they’re working, and what if it makes you ejaculate “hands free”? How would you explain that sticky wet spot in the front of your pants? How would you mask that unique scent of your cum? Ladies, what’s your opinion? What is the world coming too now!

Secretia

C.Munro
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 01:10 pm: [report]

“I still jerk-off manually.”
—The Dude.

_jsw_
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 01:27 pm: [report]

@JennyPurr: I assumed it was flexible, but it didn’t seem to me like it would stretch much because I assumed it was made of rubber. If if can stretch without being uncomfortably tight, then that makes it more appealing. Still, even after looking at the site, it seems like one couldn’t comfortably insert one’s penis into someone with it on, so the couple’s play would be external only. Nothing wrong with that, but an insertable version seems to be more usable. I realize you could slide it down further, but I’m thinking that it’d only really feel good for the guy right under the head.

@Secret Story Time: I imagine that some men could ejaculate simply by wearing something like this, but I strongly suspect that most men could not. And if it did its job, I don’t see men wanting to have their pants on while it was doing it, because having an erection while fully clothed is not comfortable, something almost every guy learns in high school when the cheerleaders walk by. The scent and wet spot, though, would be easy enough to deal with: Depends. I mean, if you’re going to walk around wearing a vibrating cock ring whilst fully clothed and in public, surely wearing Depends isn’t going to be considered “too embarrassing”.

C.Munro
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 01:33 pm: [report]

I mean, if you’re going to walk around wearing a vibrating cock ring whilst fully clothed and in public, surely wearing Depends isn’t going to be considered “too embarrassing”.

If we had sigs here, I’d put this in mine.

MuchoMacho
wrote on October 27 2009 @ 01:43 pm: [report]

@secret

vibrating c**k rings feel nice around the base. it isnt going to give me an orgasm, but i like how it feels during sex.