Blake Lively’s Boobs And Legs Roam Free In Yet Another Red Carpet Gown
Posted by: Jessica Wakeman
Filed in:
style
11:40AM, Monday September 21st 2009
It’s hard being Blake Lively. Between Leighton Meester‘s alleged sex tape, Ed Westwick‘s stupid tattoos, and Taylor Momsen‘s incessant partying, she’s the only class act “Gossip Girl” has got going. Yet, when it comes to the red carpet, subtlety eludes the poor thing.
Remember when Blake walked the red carpet at the Met Ball? We see where she was going with her diaphanous turquoise gown, but all those boobies and so much leg? Really? (As the Fug Girls put it, you looked like “an East German ice dancer attending a Communist spectacular in the late ‘70s. No offense to Communists.”) Then last night at the Emmy Awards, Blake arrived half-dressed to the red carpet once again, this time in yet another slip dress with a check-out-my-cleavage plunging neckline.
Blake, honey, when you’re showing more skin than either of the Kardashian sisters, there’s a problem. In fact, it’s making us all uncomfortable. You’re kind of like the 9th grader who shows up to the school dance in a dress that makes all the teachers blush. You’re actually a really gorgeous young woman and this slit-dress-deep-neckline look is not working for you. Just cover up your boobs or both your legs and you won’t look like you’re trying so hard to be “glamorous.” Next red carpet, perhaps Leighton can help you get dressed?
TheFrisky.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 10:43 am: [report]
Wowza, sideboob alert!
GreenAura
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 10:45 am: [report]
Are her boobs fake? If so, the doc did a pretty good job. If those are real, they are amazing.
bethlynn00
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 10:47 am: [report]
I actually like both of the dresses and I think she looks good! I mean if she’s comfortable with it, why not let her show some skin? If you got it, flaunt it!
Plus she may be showing more skin than either of the K sisters, but she still has way more class and tact than both of them, combined if you ask me.
maroon
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 10:51 am: [report]
if the girl can rock it (which she obviously can), then let her rock it. i’d kill to look like that in those dresses.
Claireific
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 10:56 am: [report]
Pfft. Hater. If I looked like her, I’d flash all kinds of boob and leg at the same time, too.
hlnbabe
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 11:04 am: [report]
@Claireific: haha me too.
Wendy Atterberry
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 11:09 am: [report]
My God, if I had her body, I’d be put out to cover it at all.
Christinaval
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 11:15 am: [report]
I loved both dresses and I would kill for her body. If I had it, I WOULD FLAUNT IT. She makes it interesting!!! Love her style!
SCRMOM
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 11:18 am: [report]
She looks great.
Lilypie
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 11:41 am: [report]
I’d probably walk the red carpet naked if I had her body!
workerbee
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 11:45 am: [report]
@GreenAura: I heard she had a boob job. I knew someone once who had a boob job like that. Just perfect. I wanted to get her dr’s name just in case. These are the pictures I’d bring in if I ever went under the knife.
Christinaval
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 12:03 pm: [report]
You know I actually think they are real. As perfect and amazing as they are, they seem real to me.
bumbler
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 12:17 pm: [report]
I have to agree with Jessica. While she has a perfect body (surgically enhanced or otherwise) the dresses she’s choosing make her look like a showgirl at her first fancy dress party. It’s not doing her justice.
CaleeKay
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 12:25 pm: [report]
I think she looks great.
OutOfLine
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 12:35 pm: [report]
Yeah, in my opinion she looks absolutely amazing. The only think i see as an issue is her hair being pulled back so tightly. For some reason it makes her look less clothed. If that makes sense to anyone but me
HitOrMissJudy
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 02:37 pm: [report]
If I looked like that, I’d be naked all the time and my apartment would be lined with mirrors. My only criticism is that she should just go with short dresses. I’m not a fan of the long dress/high slit combo.
myocum31
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 06:53 pm: [report]
I have no clue who she is. I think she looks great but I honestly just think the dresses are mediocre. I think the first would look better without the sleeve, and the second dress just looks like a red bag with some… And then why choose almost the exact same style? I think she’d look great in a short dress.
LaRosa
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 07:44 pm: [report]
I agree with the masses, she looks awesome!
Laurel
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 08:14 pm: [report]
Why’re you hating, Jessica? She looks great, skin and all. She looks like a self-possessed, confident, sexy young woman.
Shasta
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 08:33 pm: [report]
Yeah Jessica. Where’s Da Love? You’re sounding a tad Perez Hilton.
I don’t know why the fashionista’s call her dress a “Don’t”.
God Almighty she is beautiful. I LOVED her look. I can’t stop staring at her perfect breasts and creamy skin.
I am in love.
DancingGeek
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 08:35 pm: [report]
I think she looks stunning!
SamL
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 08:45 pm: [report]
Yeah, I have to agree, she does look stunning, whoever she is. Great curves….. </jealousy>
Sam xxx
Jessica Wakeman
wrote on September 21 2009 @ 08:52 pm: [report]
@Shasha and @Laurel I’m not hating! I LOVE Blake Lively and “Gossip Girl.” I just feel totally awkward seeing her half-naked on the red carpet. I just think, “But Serena, where’s the rest of your dress?!”