Australians Want To Ban Small-Breasted Women And Female Ejaculation In Porn
Posted by: Kelli Bender
Filed in:
news
1:10PM, Friday January 29th 2010
The Australian government apparently has some issues with a woman’s “down under.” The Classification Board for the country’s smut industry is working on banning porn that includes female ejaculation and/or small breasts. The censors are trying to block any websites that include or link to material that include these particular “offenders.” Customs officials are also being advised to confiscate any pornography that has instances of female ejaculation. So, I guess now would be an ideal time to look into becoming an Australian Customs Official since screening smut could be part of your job description? But this is not the most outrageous element of this new ban—what’s worse is the reasoning.
According to Fiona Patten, of the Australian Sex Party, this is not the first time that the country has tried to give small-breasted women the boot. The issue was ignited several years ago when a senator claimed that small breasts encouraged pedophilia in viewers. So apparently, I should be concerned about my boyfriend preferring the company of children just because I can barely fill a B-cup?
The reasoning behind the ban on female ejaculation is “golden” … literally. Based on Classification Guidelines for pornography in Australia, female ejaculation is a form of urination which falls under the label of the already prohibited act of “golden showers.” If that isn’t enough, the Classification Guidelines also claim that female ejaculation is an “abhorrent” depiction. To me this is argument comparable to (and just as legally sound as) a grade school boy claiming that girls are smelly. The Australian Sex Party summed up ignorance and just plain ridiculousness of these justifications, arguing: “There are over one million sites featuring female ejaculation and for Australia to be banning depictions and discussion of this important issue, takes us back into the Victorian era where they didn’t even believe that women could have orgasms.” [The Register, Jezebel]
Tags: feminism, porn, breasts, orgasms, australia

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information
Bio
Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.
This profile is private.
This profile is under review.
We were unable to follow this user.
We were unable to follow this user. Are you logged in?
You are now following this user.
We were unable to stop following this user.
We were unable to stop following this user. Are you logged in?
You are no longer following this user.
We were unable to ignore this user.
We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?
This user is now ignored.
We were unable to stop ignoring this user.
We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?
This user is no longer ignored.
We encountered a problem recommending this user.
pluck_user_recommend_permission
You have recommended this user.


Please wait while we perform your request.
Name withheld
brandyalexander
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:16 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore brandyalexander. Show DetailsHide Details
Umm, btw, "Thanks, Cheese, for bringing this story to our attention"Someone needed to add that...
Name withheld
bumbler
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:16 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore bumbler. Show DetailsHide Details
Ugh, no word on waxed pubes?
Name withheld
effing hickster
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:23 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore effing hickster. Show DetailsHide Details
@bumbler: Shhhh! Don't give them any more ideas!
Name withheld
_jsw_
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:28 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore _jsw_. Show DetailsHide Details
Indeed, [url=http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-reader-revealed-we-need-a-dose-of-resullins/#comment-133285]thanks, CheeeeEEEEse[/url].
Name withheld
A.J.R.
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:29 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore A.J.R.. Show DetailsHide Details
I've heard that some of the "ejaculation" in female ejaculation videos IS actually urination. So if Australia's obscenity laws ban urination in porn, I guess they do kind of have a case.
Name withheld
_jsw_
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:32 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore _jsw_. Show DetailsHide Details
@A.J.R. I agree that much of what is shown probably is urination, simply because otherwise they'd (a) need women who actually ejaculate, of which there probably aren't enough due to the demand, and (b) need to make sure they had real orgasms, which has never been a porn priority.
Name withheld
CheeeeEEEEse
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:32 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore CheeeeEEEEse. Show DetailsHide Details
In porn they do all kinds of stuff to make it look like 'real' female ejaculation, however it usually isn't. However that is to say that it does actually exist in women, it's just difficult to reproduce.
Name withheld
Humble Bee
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:34 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Humble Bee. Show DetailsHide Details
Thats mean!Little boobs need love too! its also insulting, I dont look like a child because I have small breasts....
Name withheld
jojo32
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:35 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore jojo32. Show DetailsHide Details
@ jsw & CheeeeEEEEse - It's not [i]that[/i] difficult to reproduce. ;)I'd totally never make it in Australian porn...boooo!
Name withheld
_jsw_
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:36 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore _jsw_. Show DetailsHide Details
@HB: As I'm sure you're well aware, the IBTC, chaired by CheeeeEEEEse, is alive and well here.
Name withheld
_jsw_
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:37 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore _jsw_. Show DetailsHide Details
@jojo32: I know. The teen pregnancy stats make that pretty obvious.
Name withheld
brandyalexander
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:37 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore brandyalexander. Show DetailsHide Details
@J and Cheese: I love the IBTC. Its nice to be appreciated.
Name withheld
jojo32
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:40 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore jojo32. Show DetailsHide Details
LOL @ jsw...good call. Bad phrasing on my part... should have quoted CheeeeEEEEse's comment.
Name withheld
AnitaBath
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:40 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore AnitaBath. Show DetailsHide Details
Yes! This eliminates some of my competition! Maybe now my lifelong dream of being an Australian porn star will come true.
Name withheld
bogart4017
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:43 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore bogart4017. Show DetailsHide Details
I didnt know Australian porn existed. Is there a difference between that and american porn?
Name withheld
SassyDaisy
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:44 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore SassyDaisy. Show DetailsHide Details
@humblebee: i agree, Small boobs need some loving too!!
Name withheld
bumbler
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:50 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore bumbler. Show DetailsHide Details
@EH I know I know I just find it laughable that they're banning a feature commonly found on adult women without commenting on a very common feature in porn that is found almost exclusively in pre-adolescents. Not that I think a bare vulva means someone is a pedophile, I think features like hairlessness and small breasts on an adult woman and a young child are completely different and a pedophile would not seek out images of a woman even if she did have small features or waxed. Morally I am repulsed by porn featuring 18 year old actresses in schoolgirl uniforms sucking on lollipops or holding stuffed animals, I just don't think small breasts could possibly fit the bill.
Name withheld
effing hickster
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 7:51 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore effing hickster. Show DetailsHide Details
@bogart4017: Yes, they do it upside-down.
Name withheld
k_roja
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 8:07 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore k_roja. Show DetailsHide Details
wow. as if society didn't already make me feel like less of a woman because i have small breasts. now i have to worry that any boyfriend i may have is a pedophile?? thanks, australia.
Name withheld
_jsw_
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 8:13 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore _jsw_. Show DetailsHide Details
@k_roja: I hope any boyfriend has chest hair and male pattern baldness, or else you might be a pedophile as well.I think the safest thing for all Australians would be to set a mandatory minimum age of 70 for all porn stars. That should end the pedophile debate once and for all.Oh, wait... 70 or older and not incontinent. That would probably narrow it down quite a bit.
Name withheld
k_roja
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 8:18 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore k_roja. Show DetailsHide Details
gaaah! my last boyfriend only had two sad little hairs on his chest. the poor things were trying desperately to keep him warm. i guess that makes me a sick and twisted woman.
Name withheld
_jsw_
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 8:20 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore _jsw_. Show DetailsHide Details
@k_roja: No, it's not an issue: you were obviously both children. Nice avatar changes, by the way.@Unclean: No, you'd be an American porn star. In Australia.
Name withheld
carbe
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 8:32 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore carbe. Show DetailsHide Details
i guess there won't be any [url=http://lemonzoo.com/funny_videos/14729/Dave_Chappelle_R_Kelly_Spoof.html]r. kelly[/url] sightings in australia anytime soon
Name withheld
KayleyA
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 8:35 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore KayleyA. Show DetailsHide Details
How ridiculous, lots of features make a woman look young, how about banning women with no pubic hair as well? Or men for that matter? Why are they immune to pedofiles looking at them?
Name withheld
hlnbabe
wrote on January 29, 2010 @ 8:38 PM
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore hlnbabe. Show DetailsHide Details
@carbe: i just laugh far too loudly in my cubicle...
comments

Please wait while we send the email.
Email This
Score
vote upvotes up
vote downvotes down










![12 Dumbest ‘Mad Men’ Moves [truTV]](http://cdn.thefrisky.com/images/uploads/9-1-wl-tru-tv-10-dumb-things-on-mad-men.jpg)


Delicious
Digg
Facebook
FriendFeed
LinkedIn
MySpace
Reddit
Slashdot
StumbleUpon
Tumblr
Twitter
Yahoo! Buzz






